Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute and science in Latin America and the Caribbean: impact and challenges
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53732/rccsociales/e701203Keywords:
Bibliometrics, open access, research, Latin America, Caribbean, scientific developmentAbstract
In recent decades, Latin America and the Caribbean have experienced significant growth in scientific production, driven by education and research policies. However, reliance on state funding and low private sector participation remain structural challenges. In this context, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) has emerged as a key player in the dissemination of regional research, offering open access to articles through an author-funded model. This study analyzes the evolution of MDPI publications in Latin America and the Caribbean, identifying key trends and characteristics. It examines the impact of factors such as reduced publication times, special issues, and incentive systems for editors and reviewers on the proliferation of articles. Additionally, criticisms regarding the rigor of the peer review process and MDPI’s impact on scientific quality are discussed. The findings provide insight into the role of this publisher within the regional academic ecosystem and its implications for scientific development.
References
Arrow, K. J. (1972). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. En C. K.
Rowley. (Ed.), Readings in Industrial Economics (pp. 219-236). Macmillan Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15486-9_13
Barrere, R. (Coord.). (2024). El Estado de la Ciencia. Principales indicadores de la ciencia y tecnología Iberoamericanos/Interamericanos. OEI.
Björk, B. C. (2018). Evolution of the scholarly mega-journal, 2006–2017. PeerJ, 6, e4357. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4357
Bourdieu, P. (2016). La distinción: criterio y bases sociales del gusto. Taurus.
Butler, L. A., Matthias, L., Simard, M. A., Mongeon, P., y Haustein, S. (2023). The oligopoly’s shift to open access: How the big five academic publishers profit from article processing charges. Quantitative Science Studies, 4(4), 778-799. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00272
Fontúrbel, F. E., y Celis-Diez, J. L. (2025). The MDPIzation of chilean science: a wake-up call about how we are conducting research and using public resources. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, 98(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40693-025-00136-0
Hanson, M. A., Barreiro, P. G., Crosetto, P., y Brockington, D. (2024). The strain on scientific publishing. Quantitative Science Studies, 5(4), 823-843. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00327
Jui-An Pan, S. (2022). Open Access Mega Journals: development, peer review mechanism, and suggested practices for the academia. Journal of Educational Media & Library Sciences, 59(3). https://doi.org/10.6120/JoEMLS.202211_59(3).0024.OR.AM
Lewis, J., Schneegans, S., y Straza, T. (2021). UNESCO Science Report: The race against time for smarter development. Unesco.
Van Dalen, H. P., y Henkens, K. (2012). Intended and unintended consequences of a publish-or-perish culture: a worldwide survey. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(7), 1282-1293. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22636
Zhang, L., Wei, Y., Huang, Y., y Sivertsen, G. (2022). Should open access lead to closed research? The trends towards paying to perform research. Scientometrics, 127(12), 7653-7679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04407-5
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista científica en ciencias sociales
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1.png)
Todo el contenido de esta revista, está bajo 