Estudio exploratorio de gestión: Ciencia vs Tecnología/Innovación

Obed Andres Solis Gonzalez; Cecilia Molina Melgoza; Rodrigo Jiménez Gallegos

doi:10.53732/rccsociales/e8844

Autores/as

Obed Andres Solis Gonzalez Instituto Tecnológico de La Piedad, Departamento de IQB, La Piedad, México https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5151-1308
Cecilia Molina Melgoza Instituto Tecnológico de La Piedad, Departamento de IQB, La Piedad, México https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7897-3535
Rodrigo Jiménez Gallegos Instituto Politécnico Nacional, ESIQIE. Ciudad de México, México https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1044-4169

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53732/rccsociales/e8844

Palabras clave:

proyecto piloto, administración de la Ciencia, tecnología, innovación, técnica administrativa, Mexico

Resumen

El objetivo general del presente trabajo fue identificar diferencias y similitudes en prácticas administrativas y factores contextuales que condicionan el éxito en proyectos de ciencia y tecnología/innovación (T+i). La metodología tuvo un enfoque cuantitativo, con diseño exploratorio y transversal, basado en la teoría de la contingencia en gestión de proyectos. Se aplicó una encuesta estructurada a 46 profesionales con experiencia en gestión y toma de decisiones en proyectos de ciencia y T+i, en tres ciudades de México. El instrumento incluyó 12 ítems distribuidos en cuatro dimensiones de éxito (tiempo, alcance, recursos humanos y calidad), validados por expertos y mediante prueba cognitiva. Los datos se analizaron mediante frecuencias y tablas de contingencia, con el fin de comparar la prevalencia y eficacia percibida de las prácticas de gestión. Los resultados indican mayor uso de técnicas administrativas formales en T+i. El Diagrama de Gantt, el benchmarking, la flexibilidad moderada en los objetivos y el liderazgo activo como motivador común predominan en ambos tipos de proyectos. En conclusión, se confirma la relevancia de un enfoque contingente, justificando estudios futuros más amplios y específicos.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Barbosa, A. P. P. L., Salerno, M. S., Brasil, V. C., y Nascimento, P. T. S. (2020). Coordination Approaches to Foster Open Innovation R&D Projects Performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 58, 101603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2020.101603

Barbosa, A. P. F. P. L., Salerno, M. S., Nascimento, P. T. S., Albala, A., Maranzato, F. P., y Tamoschus, D. (2021). Configurations of project management practices to enhance the performance of open innovation R&D projects. International Journal of Project Management, 39(2), 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.06.005

Bilal, A., Siddiquei, A., Asadullah, M. A., Awan, H. M., y Asmi, F. (2021). Servant leadership: a new perspective to explore project leadership and team effectiveness. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 29(3), 699-715. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-12-2019-1975

Bongiovanni, A., Colotti, G., Liguori, G. L., Di Carlo, M., Digilio, F. A., Lacerra, G., Mascia, A., Cirafici, A. M., Barra, A., Lanati, A., y Kisslinger, A. (2015). Applying Quality and Project Management methodologies in biomedical research laboratories: a public research network’s case study. Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 20, 203-213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-015-1132-5

Bujang, M. A., Omar, E. D., Foo, D. H. P., y Hon, Y. K. (2024). Sample size determination for conducting a pilot study to assess reliability of a questionnaire. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 49(1), e3. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2024.49.e3

Chernogorova, Y., Bliznakov, Z., y Bliznakova, K. (2021). Management challenges in implementing scientific projects during COVID-19 pandemic. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 23(1), 136–150. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2021.23.1.09

Dasí, À., Pedersen, T., Barakat, L. L., y Alves, T. R. (2020). Teams and project performance: An ability, motivation, and opportunity approach. Project Management Journal, 52(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972820953958

Dong, X., y Qiu, W. (2024). A method for managing scientific research project resource conflicts and predicting risks using BP neural networks. Scientific Reports, 14, 9238. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024- 59911-w

Fan, X., Yang, X. y Yu, Z (2021). Effect of basic research and applied research on the universities’ innovation capabilities: the moderating role of private research funding. Scientometrics, 126, 5387–5411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03998-9

Fernandes, G., Tassari, G., Rocha, L., Santos, J. M. R. C. A., Ferreira, L. M. D. F., Ribeiro, P., y O’Sullivan, D. (2024a). Overcoming the “use misfit” of project management practices in collaborative research, development and innovation. Project Leadership and Society, 5, 100137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2024.100137

Fernandes, G., Tassari, G., Rocha, L., Ferreira, L. M. D. F., Santos, J. M. R. C. A., Ribeiro, P., Barroso, D., y Pinto, E. B. (2024b). Useful Project Management Practices in Collaborative R&D&I Projects. Procedia Computer Science, 239, 1062–1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.06.270

Han, H., y Zhang, X. (2024). Servant leadership and project success: The mediating roles of team learning orientation and team agility. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1417604. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1417604

Johnson, M. R., Bolte, J., Veldman, T., y Sutton, L. (2020). Establishing a project management community of practice in a large academic health system. Journal of Research Administration, 51(2), 102–113. https://www.srainternational.org/blogs/srai-jra1/2020/09/29/establishing-a-project-management- community-of-practice

Mahembe, B., y Engelbrecht, A. S. (2013). The relationship between servant leadership, affective team commitment and team effectiveness. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(1), a495. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v11i1.495

Mandona, I., y Muya, M. (2020). Project Management Application in Academic and Research Institutions in Zambia. Journal of Research Administration, 51(2), 114–139. https://www.srainternational.org/blogs/srai-jra1/2020/09/29/project-management-application-in- academic-and-research-institutions

Mangul, S., Martin, L. S., Hill, B. L., Lam, A. K-M., Distler, M. G., Zelikovsky, A., Eskin, E., Flint, J. (2019). Systematic benchmarking of omics computational tools. Nature Communications, 10, 1393. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09406-4

Mazunina, M. V., Rubin, A. G., Zinchenko, N. V., Gribok, N. N., y Vorobyova, M. A. (2020). A risk-oriented approach to quality management during the implementation of innovative projects for company’s strategic development: Ways to increase effectiveness. International Journal for Quality Research, 15(2), 417–434. https://doi.org/10.24874/IJQR15.02-04.

Morgan, S. E., Ahn, S., Mosser, A., Harrison, T. R., Wang, J., Huang, Q., Ryan, A., Mao, B., y Bixby, J. (2021). The effect of team communication behaviors and processes on interdisciplinary teams’ research productivity and team satisfaction. Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 24, 83-110. https://doi.org/10.28945/4857

Nadal-Burgues, N. (2014). Project specification: Creativity and rhetoric in scientific research, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 27(5), 807-818. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-09-2014-0176

Pabst, R., Tyrasa, I., Händschke, S., Siepmann, R., y Gonera, A. (2020). Context is king: Facilitation in innovation projects. A comparison between academic and industry projects. Journal of Innovation Management, 8(3), 48–74. https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-0606_008.003_0005

Pacagnella, A. C., Da Silva, S. L., Pacifico, O., De Arruda Ignacio, P. S., y da Silva, A. L. (2019). Critical success factors for project manufacturing environments. Project Management Journal, 50(2), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972819827670

Project Management Institute. (2021). A guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (7ma ed.). Project Management Institute.

Sabden, O., Kozhakhmetova, A., Zhidebekkyzy, A., y Turdalina, S. (2020). The impact of organizational support on project efficiency: evidence from Kazakhstan. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 18(4), 203-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(4).2020.18.

Santos, J., y Brandao, A. (2022). The R&D canvas: A design thinking tool for the management of R&D projects. Journal of Research Administration, 53(1), 62-92. https://www.srainternational.org/blogs/srai-jra1/2022/02/28/the-rd-canvas-a-design-thinking-tool-for- the-management-of-rd-projects

Serrador, P., y Turner, J.R. (2014). The relationship between project success and project efficiency. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119, 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.011

Shenhar, A., Levy, O., y Dvir, D. (1997). Mapping the dimensions of project success. Project Management Journal, 28(2), 5–13. https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/mapping-dimensions-project-success-5378

Suominen, A., Kauppinen, H., y Hyytinen, K. (2021). ‘Gold’, ‘Ribbon’ or ‘Puzzle’: What motivates researchers to work in research and technology organizations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 170, 120882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120882

Valencia-Achuri, P. A., y Taboada-Álvarez, J. E. (2022). Management of Research and Innovation Projects under the triple helix model. Techno Review. International Technology, Science and Society Review/Revista Internacional De Tecnología, Ciencia y Sociedad, 11(5), 1–17. https://journals.eaapublishing.org/journal/technorev/12/article/545

Wilemon, D. L. (2000, Junio). Project management research: experiences and perspectives. PMI® Research Conference 2000: Project Management Research at the Turn of the Millennium, Paris, France. https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/project-management-research-experiences-perspectives-1084

Zada, M., Khan, J., Saeed, I., Zada, S., y Jun, Z. Y. (2023). Linking public leadership with project management effectiveness: Mediating role of goal clarity and moderating role of top management support. Heliyon, 9(5), e15543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15543

Zwikael, O. y Gilchrist, A. (2023). Planning to fail: When is project planning counterproductive? IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 70(1), 220-231. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3053585